Mazda 2 2003 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 124 NM | 106 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 284 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | no data | |
Mazda 2 has 17 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |