Mazda 2 2003 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 10 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Fiesta, Ford Fusion | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |