Mazda 2 2006 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 38 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |