Mazda 2 2006 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 22 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 23 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |