Mazda 2 2006 vs Ford Fiesta 2005

 
Mazda 2
2006 - 2007
Ford Fiesta
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 80 HP80 HP
Torque: 124 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds14.6 seconds
Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
610 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.53 m1.46 m
Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres284 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1044 litresno data
Mazda 2 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`505no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • fewer faults
Ford Fiesta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv