Mazda 2 2006 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Fiesta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 2 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |