Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 2006 and Mazda 2 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 2 2006 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2003, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 2006 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2006 and Mazda 2 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Mazda 2 2006 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 2 has
| |