Mazda 2 2006 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |