Mazda 2 2006 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |