Mazda 2 2006 vs Suzuki Swift 2006

 
Mazda 2
2006 - 2007
Suzuki Swift
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP92 HP
Torque: 110 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.1 seconds12.8 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 2 engine produces 17 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.3
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway880 km on highway
650 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.70 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.53 m1.54 m
Mazda 2 is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres198 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1044 litres562 litres
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 2 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 482 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4901`485
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14002400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv