Mazda 2 2007 vs Suzuki Splash 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 9 HP more power than Suzuki Splash, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Suzuki Splash. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Agila | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Splash might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger, but lower. Mazda 2 is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 263 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Splash has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |