Mazda 2 2007 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mazda 2 engine produces 1 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Despite the higher power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Ignis | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Mazda 2 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 2 is 21 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | 562 litres | |
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 225 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |