Mazda 2 2008 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 and Suzuki Splash have the same engine power, but Mazda 2 torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Splash. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Splash is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used also on Opel Agila | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 2 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger, but lower. Mazda 2 is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Splash has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |