Mazda 2 2007 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Mazda 2
2007 - 2010
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 86 HP75 HP
Torque: 122 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds12.9 seconds
Mazda 2 engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 4 NM less than Volkswagen Polo.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
640 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
787 litres1030 litres
Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 243 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`485no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24002000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv