Mazda 2 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 2 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 178 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 609 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |