Mazda 2 2010 vs Citroen C3 2013

 
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Citroen C3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 102 HP120 HP
Torque: 133 NM156 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 2 engine produces 18 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.5
Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway1020 km on highway
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.94 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.48 m1.52 m
Mazda 2 is smaller.
Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
787 litresno data
Citroen C3 has more luggage space.
Mazda 2 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4951`612
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 36007600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Citroen C3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv