Mazda 2 2010 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Fiesta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |