Mazda 2 2010 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 9 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 5 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |