Mazda 2 2021 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 50 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 79 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 18 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 266 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 2 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |