Mazda 2 2008 vs Suzuki Swift 2006

 
Mazda 2
2008 - 2010
Suzuki Swift
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.3 Petrol
Diesel (Mazda 2) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Swift) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 68 HP92 HP
Torque: 160 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds12.8 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 2 engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 44 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.36.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway880 km on highway
870 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 6 years19 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.70 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.48 m1.54 m
Mazda 2 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 2 is 20 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres198 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
787 litres562 litres
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 2 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 225 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5201`485
Safety:
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Suzuki Swift has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv