Mazda 2 2009 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 72 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Mazda 2 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 2 is 21 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | 562 litres | |
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 225 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |