Mazda 2 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 35 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 2 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger. Mazda 2 is 49 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 111 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Toyota Aygo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |