Mazda 2 2009 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller. Mazda 2 is 13 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |