Mazda 2 2009 vs Mazda 2 2008

 
Mazda 2
2009 - 2010
Mazda 2
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP103 HP
Torque: 205 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda 2 2008 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 2 2009 engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda 2 2008, but torque is 68 NM more than Mazda 2 2008. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.25.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.1 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Mazda 2 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 2 2009 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2008, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 2009 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2008.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway870 km on highway
840 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Mazda 2 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.90 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2009 and Mazda 2 2008 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
787 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5401`485
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 24002400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv