Mazda 2 2010 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta have the same engine power, but Mazda 2 torque is 5 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Fiesta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |