Mazda 2 2010 vs Audi A1 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 5 HP more power than Audi A1, but torque is 25 NM less than Audi A1. Despite the higher power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Audi A1 2011 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Audi A1 2011 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 6 cm shorter than the Audi A1, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 249 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A1 has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 21 litres less trunk space than the Audi A1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A1, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`025 kg | 1`210 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 375 kg | |
| Mazda 2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Audi A1. Therefore, Mazda 2 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi A1 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A1 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Audi A1 has
| |