Mazda 2 2015 vs Kia Venga 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Venga, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Kia Venga. Despite less power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 2 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Venga, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Venga might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller. Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Venga, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Kia Venga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Venga, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Kia Venga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Kia Venga, so Kia Venga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Kia Venga has
| |