Mazda 2 2015 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 10 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | 653 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Aveo is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Aveo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 335 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |