Mazda 2 2015 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |