Mazda 2 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 110 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | no data | |
| Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`714 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |