Mazda 2 2015 vs Kia Venga 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Venga is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 34 HP less power than Kia Venga, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Kia Venga. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Venga, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Venga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Venga 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller. Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Venga, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | 1486 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Kia Venga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Venga (by 536 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Venga, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Kia Venga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Kia Venga, so Kia Venga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Kia Venga has
| |