Mazda 2 2015 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 25 NM more than Honda Jazz. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger, but lower. Mazda 2 is 7 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 364 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 2 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Jazz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Honda Jazz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |