Mazda 2 2015 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Mazda 2 torque is 12 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`564 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |