Mazda 2 2010 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda 2 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Swift has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 133 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 5.8 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
|
On average, the Mazda 2 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 204 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |