Mazda 2 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda 2 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 133 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 5.8 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 315 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |