Mazda 2 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 78 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 133 NM | 120 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14 seconds | 7.5 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 5.8 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo MiTo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 14 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`457 | ~ 1`629 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |