Mazda 2 2003 vs Mazda Demio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 63 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 103 - 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16 seconds | 13 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.1 | 6.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Demio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger. Mazda 2 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda Demio, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1298 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Demio. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 254 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`512 | ~ 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |