Mazda 2 2003 vs Ford Fusion 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 110 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16 seconds | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.1 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fusion. On average, a Mazda 2 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Fusion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Fusion, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`512 | ~ 1`623 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |