Mazda 2 2003 vs Fiat Panda 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda 2 is available only with front wheel drive, while Fiat Panda can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 54 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 88 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16 seconds | 9.5 - 20 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.1 | 4.3 - 6.6 | |
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Panda. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
Mazda 2 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 2 is 38 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | no data | |
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Panda. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`512 | ~ 818 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | low | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |