Mazda 2 2006 vs Nissan Note 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 128 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 15.1 seconds | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.7 | 5.1 - 7.0 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller. Mazda 2 is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1332 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 288 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`576 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
| |