Mazda 2 2006 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 15.1 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.7 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 8 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 112 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |