Mazda 2 2010 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 205 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. On average, a Mazda 2 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 2 has 46 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`499 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |