Mazda 2 2010 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 205 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.3 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`499 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Fiesta scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Fiesta scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |