Mazda 2 2010 vs Nissan Note 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Nissan Note
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 1.61.2 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 75 - 102 HP80 - 98 HP
Torque: 119 - 205 NM110 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 14.9 seconds11.7 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 6.33.6 - 5.1
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m4.10 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.48 m1.53 m
Mazda 2 is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres325 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
787 litres1495 litres
Nissan Note has more luggage space.
Mazda 2 has 75 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 708 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`499~ 1`510
Safety:
Nissan Note is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Note scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 36004800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Nissan Note has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv