Mazda 2 2010 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 102 HP | 104 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 205 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, a Mazda 2 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 67 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 169 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`499 | ~ 1`846 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |