Mazda 2 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Honda Jazz
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 1.3 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 2 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 75 - 102 HP90 - 99 HP
Torque: 119 - 205 NM114 - 127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 14.9 seconds11 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 6.35.3
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.90 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.48 m1.53 m
Mazda 2 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 2 is 2 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres428 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
787 litres1396 litres
Honda Jazz has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 609 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz.
Gross weight: ~ 1`499 kg~ 1`510 kg
Net weight:~ 981 kg~ 1`050 kg
Load capacity:~ 518 kg~ 460 kg
Mazda 2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Mazda 2 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 36003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Honda Jazz has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv