Lexus SC 2001 vs Mercedes CLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 419 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus SC is more dynamic to drive. Lexus SC engine produces 123 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 189 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Lexus SC reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus SC consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus SC could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
| Lexus SC is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 10 cm wider, while the height of Lexus SC is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus SC has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |