Lexus RX 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.3 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.90 m | |
| Lexus RX is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |