Lexus RX 1997 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus RX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 76 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 12 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.86 m | |
| Lexus RX is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 742 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Lexus RX has 253 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Lexus RX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |