Lexus RX 1997 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus RX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 101 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Lexus RX is larger. Lexus RX is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 17 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
| |