Lexus RX 1997 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 17 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.5 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |